Bruce Witherspoon v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e do not wish to lay down a rule which would require the full application of Rule 11 on every occasion in a contested case where a stipulation of one or more facts is tendered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-24· cited 145×
• United States v. James J. Lyons
  First Circuit· 1990-03-13· cited 79×
• United States v. Edward Avery Herndon
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 78×
• United States v. Dennis Wellington
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-03· cited 53×
• People v. Adams
  California Supreme Court· 1993-12-09· cited 49×
• United States v. Julius Carroll Robertson
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-02-07· cited 39×
• Weiker v. Solem
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 18×
• A.E.K. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-07· cited 15×
• United States v. Fred Stalder
  Eighth Circuit· 1982-12-21· cited 14×
• State v. Miller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 14×
• United States v. Kepple
  U S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1988-12-13· cited 10×
• United States v. Jtton Edward Watson
  Sixth Circuit· 2025-07-09· cited 2×
• Bonilla Romero v. United States
  D. Puerto Rico· 1990-10-23· cited 1×
• AEK v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. John Craige Terrack
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-04-16· cited 53×
• United States v. Paul K. Strother
  D.C. Circuit· 1978-05-09· cited 51×
• United States v. James Dwayne Wray
  Eighth Circuit· 1979-11-09· cited 18×