United States v. Dennis Wellington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting this Court’s “baseline aversion to resolving ineffectiveness claims on direct review” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]o the extent that defendant instructed his counsel to pursue a course of action that defendant now complains of, there was no abridgement—constructive or otherwise—of defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).