Skip to main content

Bruce v. State

Citations

  • 614 P.2d 813
  • 126 Ariz. 271
  • 1980 Ariz. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that city magistrates are considered \judges in courts inferior to the superior court\
  • recognizing that city magistrates are considered “judges in courts inferior to the superior court”
  • “[A] preemption argument that affects the choice of forum rather than the choice of law is not waivable; thus, it can be raised for the first time on appeal.”
  • “Jurisdiction cannot be waived and may be raised at any stage of the proceedings.”
  • in dictum , characterizing § 22-301 as establishing the jurisdiction of justice court
  • the subject matter jurisdiction of the Tucson City Court is limited by Article VI, § 32 of the Arizona Constitution, which, by its terms applies to justice of the peace courts and courts inferior to the superior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Struckmeyer, Hays, Cameron, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.