BRT General Corp. v. Water Pollution Control Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although entitled application to “ ‘connect’ ” to sewer system, trial court found “that the application was for an ‘extension’ of the sewer system”
• mandamus action brought against authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-25· cited 37×
• Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control Authority
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-21· cited 20×
• AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-27· cited 20×
• Piteau v. Board of Education
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-04-19· cited 14×
• Zahrijczuk v. Water Pollution Control Authority of Branford
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2012-04-10· cited 2×
• Ridgefield Housing Authority v. Ridgefield Water Pollution Control Authority
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-09-06· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Waterbury v. Town of Washington
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-02· cited 132×
• Cannata v. Department of Environmental Protection
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-17· cited 109×
• Webster Bank v. Zak
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 52×
• Gordon v. Tobias
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-25· cited 34×
• Clark v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-06-16· cited 17×
• River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Water Pollution Control Authority
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-11-26· cited 16×
• Kish v. Cohn
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-08· cited 9×
• Archambault v. Water Pollution Control Authority of Waterford
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-04-14· cited 5×