Webster Bank v. Zak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a party must have slanding to assert a claim in order for the court to have subject matter jurisdiction over the claim”
• party that alleges it is successor in interest to owner of foreclosed property has alleged sufficient interest to intervene in foreclosure action
• “[t]his court has often stated that the question of subject matter jurisdic tion, because it addresses the basic competency of the court, can be raised by any of the parties, or by the court sua sponte, at any time” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• reviewing Appellate Court’s remand for factual findings regarding standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Webster Bank v. Zak

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Webster Bank v. Zak
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-13· cited 13×
• Webster Bank v. Zak
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-01-16· cited 3×
• Webster Bank v. Zak
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-02-28· cited 1×
• Webster Bank v. Zak
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-27