Browning v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court cannot reach alleged trial errors on post-conviction if errors were not raised in post-conviction claims
• “We will not treat the post-conviction process as a second appeal, and will apply the doctrines of res judicata and waiver where a claim either was, or could have been, raised in the petitioner’s direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coddington v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-08-23· cited 21×
• BENCH v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2021-12-22· cited 10×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-08-20· cited 8×
• Santoyo v. Jones
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-07-18

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Enmund v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
• Tison v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
• Browning v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-04-24· cited 89×
• Warner v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-04-20· cited 49×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-10-27· cited 30×
• Al-Mosawi v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-03-11· cited 11×
• Hooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-03-14· cited 5×
• Bland v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-11-18· cited 5×
• Hanson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-06-11· cited 1×