Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 324 Ga. App. 718
  • 751 S.E.2d 517
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 3734
  • 2013 WL 6017428
  • 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he child molestation statute does not require proof of the defendant’s actual arousal” and that the intent to arouse may be inferred
  • holding that evidence that the defendant exposed his penis to a child and had her touch it supported the inference that the defendant had acted with the intent to arouse or satisfy himself sexually
  • the child molestation statute “requires only that the defendant have acted with the intent to arouse his sexual desires”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Branch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.