Brown v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although Coney was not applicable, court would have found noncompliance with Coney procedure was harmless, as record reflected appellant consulted with counsel immediately before bench conference and immediately after, before counsel accepted jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brower v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 13×
• Butler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-27· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-18· cited 371×
• Coney v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 135×
• Francis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-04-15· cited 93×
• Lett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-05· cited 17×
• Mejia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-13· cited 16×