District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/22/2000
Brown v. State
Citations
- 771 So. 2d 603
- 2000 WL 1727032
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confirming that the State may comment on a defendant’s failure to testify where such comment is invited by the defense
- holding prosecutor’s comments were permissible as an invited response
- “A narrow exception to the rule forbidding a comment on a defendant’s failure to testify applies where the prosecution’s statement is invited by the defense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Polen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 78×
- Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-04· cited 68×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-20· cited 11×
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-10· cited 10×
- Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.