Brown v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that even though the facts would support a finding of probable cause to arrest, such a finding is not dispositive; “ ‘[flor there to be an escape, there must first be a valid arrest.’ ” (quoting Kyser v. State, 533 So.2d 285, 287 (Fla.1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pollen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-15· cited 7×
• Sweeney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-16· cited 6×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-23· cited 5×
• Elliot v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-02· cited 5×
• Moncrieffe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-16· cited 5×
• Jahquell Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-27· cited 3×
• Hebert v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-12· cited 2×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-10· cited 2×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. LERONCE JALINE MEELIQUE CHEEKS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-15
• Degon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-19
• DEANGELO GEORGE ROBINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-02-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-10-26· cited 62×
• State v. Ramsey
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 36×
• Lamb v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 25×
• Kyser v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-10-27· cited 20×
• State v. Akers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-14· cited 16×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-08· cited 3×