District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/18/2009
Brown v. State
Citations
- 24 So. 3d 671
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19763
- 2009 WL 4874530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We think Gant is simply a fine-tuning of Belton, not a complete overhaul.”
- “To apply the exclusionary rule in this case cannot possibly' deter police because they' did exactly what they' “were trained to do based on what we (judges) told them was appropriate.”
- “To apply the exclusionary rule in this case cannot possibly deter police because they did exactly what they were trained to do based on what we (judges) told them was appropriate.”
- “It is clear ... that the “nature of the charge” is determinative of whether there exists a reasonable basis to search for evidence, not whether there is some independent evidence that gives rise to a belief that the particular vehicle contains evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohen, Evander, Torpy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- v. KesslerColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-03· cited 206×
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-11-04· cited 93×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-07-06· cited 48×
- People v. NottoliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-09-26· cited 39×
- State v. CantrellIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-03-16· cited 17×
- United States v. ReaganE.D. Tennessee· 2010-05-19· cited 15×
- State v. KarsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-07-30· cited 14×
- State v. Mose B. CoffeeWisconsin Supreme Court· 2020-06-05· cited 14×
- State v. FrederickIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-07-27· cited 12×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-17· cited 8×
- State v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-14· cited 8×
- State v. K.N.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-29· cited 7×
- State v. Wade F. LilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-08· cited 6×
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-25· cited 6×
- State v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 3×
- Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-03· cited 2×
- State v. EversoleOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-06· cited 2×
- State v. McIntoshDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-25· cited 1×
- State v. McCulloughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-30· cited 1×
- State v. ConleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-18· cited 1×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 1,685×
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 1,388×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 693×
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-05-24· cited 660×
- United States v. McCaneTenth Circuit· 2009-07-28· cited 216×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.