Brown v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although defendant entered school during regular business hours when the office was open and unlocked, because defendant did not have authority to be in area where he was found, “where the props and purses were,” the jury was authorized to find the “without authority” element of burglary
• although defendant entered school during regular business hours when the office was open and unlocked, because defendant did not have authority to be in area where he was found, “where the props and purses were,” the jury was authorized to find the “without authority” element of burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hambrick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-04-02· cited 58×
• Abney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-06· cited 26×
• Glisson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-02-04· cited 20×
• Zabain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-02· cited 5×
• Casper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-08-05· cited 2×
• Deshawn Zabian v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ealey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-06-21· cited 12×
• Mayfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-02-17· cited 5×