Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 601 S.E.2d 405
  • 268 Ga. App. 24
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2207
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Because a witness’s letters were cumulative of the witness’s trial testimony, the trial court’s erroneous exclusion of the letters as a discovery sanction was harmless.
  • “[A] showing of bad faith and prejudice to the state is required to warrant exclusion of evidence.”
  • “the exclusion of evidence which is merely cumulative is not reversible error”
  • \the exclusion of what clearly would have been cumulative evidence was certainly harmless\
  • “the exclusion of what clearly would have been cumulative evidence was certainly harmless”
  • “[T]he exclusion of what clearly would have been cumulative evidence was certainly harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikell, Blackburn, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.