Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 409 P.2d 772
  • 196 Kan. 236
  • 1966 Kan. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the rule giving the district court discretion to ascertain whether the claim was substantial before granting an evidentiary hearing but applying a de novo standard in determining that the movant should have received a full evidentiary hearing
  • prisoner s presence required at full evidentiary hearing because it involved a substantial issue of fact as to events in which tire prisoner had participated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Fontron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.