Skip to main content

Brown v. Nutter, McClennen & Fish

Citations

  • 45 Mass. App. Ct. 212
  • 696 N.E.2d 953
  • 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 217
  • 1998 Mass. App. LEXIS 517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the MWCA provides the exclusive remedy for an injured employee alleging injury caused by the tortious conduct by a coemployee that is committed in the course of the coemployee’s employment
  • affirming dismissal of employee’s claim against employer for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on exclusivity clause of Workers’ Compensation Act
  • affirming dismissal of plaintiffs claim against her former employer for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on exclusivity of Workers’ Compensation Act
  • WCA 3 The plaintiff does not allege that he submitted a qualifying waiver. 2 provides employees injured on job exclusive remedy against employers
  • tort claim not barred by exclusivity provision where supervisor compelled plaintiff to falsify legal documents for his own personal gain and not to further law firm employer’s interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lenk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.