Brown v. Brown
Citations
- 79 Va. 648
- 1884 Va. LEXIS 126
Syllabus
<p>1. Legacies—Abatement.—If abatement of general legacies is necessary to pay debts and specific legacies, the rule is, that where all stand on same footing the abatement must be on all fro rata. But if a legatee has relinquished any right in consideration of his or her legacy, such as dower, or distributive share, such legatee has preference over mere volunteers, and this, too, even if value of legacy exceeds value of right relinquished.</p> <p>2. Idem—Personal Decrees.—Legatee may take legacy and pay testators debts, or decline legacy and avoid the debts. Decree must be in the alternative, and not personal against legatee for the debts.</p>
Judges: Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- First National Exchange Bank v. HughsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-03-09· cited 18×
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia· 1924-06-12· cited 11×
- Muse v. MuseSupreme Court of Virginia· 1947-11-24· cited 6×
- Harper v. CUMBERLAND & ALLEGHENY GAS COMPANYWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1954-09-28· cited 4×
- Simpson v. NicolSupreme Court of Virginia· 1931-11-12· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.