Brown v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• It is “well settled that, where one of two obligors equally bound pays off and discharges the obligation, he is entitled to recover from the other the proportion that he was obligated to pay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harper v. Harper
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-23· cited 106×
• Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, Inc
  D.C. Circuit· 1974-10-08· cited 60×
• Lawson v. Ridgeway
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1951-06-25· cited 47×
• Potthoff v. Potthoff
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-01-29· cited 36×
• Tester v. Tester
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-18· cited 33×
• Heslip v. Heslip
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1953-11-03· cited 24×
• Anthony v. Anthony
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-07· cited 22×
• Morga v. Friedlander
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-04-19· cited 8×
• Fischer v. Sommer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-05-23· cited 7×
• Bishop v. Pecanic
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-28· cited 5×
• Valley Nat. Bank v. Fulton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1×
• Majewski v. Eyre
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-19· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Horton v. Horton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1929-06-19· cited 28×
• Ammerman v. Crozier
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1930-10-03· cited 5×