Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/7/2006

Brown v. Brown

Citations

136 P.3d 745
206 Or. App. 239
2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Oregon courts impose constructive trusts as remedial devices to avoid unjust enrichment when no other adequate remedy is available.”
“A constructive trust is merely a procedural 22 device to which the courts resort in order to effect restitution of property.”
“In short, in a proceeding for declar- atory relief, the claimant’s pleading must allege a cognizable theory of relief, which if proved, would support the declaration sought.”
“A constructive trust is merely a procedural device to which the courts resort in order to effect restitution of property in specie. It is not a part of the substantive law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.