Washington Supreme Court· 3/28/1955
Brown v. Brown
Citations
- 281 P.2d 850
- 46 Wash. 2d 370
- 1955 Wash. LEXIS 489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] court can effectuate its decree by contempt proceedings against persons within its jurisdiction, even though interests in land in another state are thereby indirectly affected.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mallery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. StepanoffAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-09-10· cited 54×
- Schiffman v. Hanson Excavating Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-08-02· cited 31×
- Noble v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-02-26· cited 31×
- Fuller v. OstruskeWashington Supreme Court· 1956-05-03· cited 27×
- OneWest Bank, FSB v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court· 2016-02-04· cited 23×
- In Re Marriage of KowalewskiWashington Supreme Court· 2008-05-08· cited 15×
- In re the Marriage of KowalewskiWashington Supreme Court· 2008-05-08· cited 14×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1974-09-12· cited 13×
- Copeland Planned Futures, Inc. v. ObenchainCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-05-29· cited 10×
- Sparkman & McLean Income Fund v. WaldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-03-18· cited 10×
- OneWest Bank, FSB v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-13· cited 5×
- Stroock v. Kirby Royalties, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1972-02-29· cited 3×
- Onewest Bank FSB v. Maureen M. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.