Brown v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the context of a motion to modify the custody provisions of a dissolution of marriage judgment, the moving party is confined to the matters he or she alleges and the adverse party may object to evidence that tends to prove grounds that were not alleged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Niedert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-01-31· cited 50×
• A. v. A.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-09-28· cited 19×
• Yeamans v. Yeamans
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-06-11· cited 7×
• State v. Templeton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-10-13· cited 1×
• In re the Marriage of Coughlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-07· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rea v. Rea
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-06-18· cited 90×
• Henrickson v. Henrickson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-01-11· cited 33×
• Leverich v. Leverich
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1944-10-04· cited 27×
• Cooley v. Cooley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-11-14· cited 24×
• Bogh v. Lumbattis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-02-16· cited 20×
• Sakraida v. Sakraida
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1951-07-06· cited 18×
• Stonebrink v. Stonebrink
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-04-23· cited 11×