California Court of Appeal· 10/3/1977
Brousseau v. Jarrett
Citations
- 73 Cal. App. 3d 864
- 141 Cal. Rptr. 200
- 1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1826
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “conelusory characterization of defendant’s conduct as intentional, willful and fraudulent is a patently insufficient statement of ‘oppression, fraud, or malice, express or implied,’ within the meaning of section 3294”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Janes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court· 1995-03-02· cited 140×
- Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-06-22· cited 80×
- Saunders v. CarissCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-10-18· cited 70×
- Block v. Sacramento Clinical Labs, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1982-04-30· cited 58×
- C & H. FOODS CO. v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1984-10-17· cited 49×
- Peace v. WeismanCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-03-02· cited 46×
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-10-29· cited 46×
- Spindle v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-01-25· cited 44×
- Clarke v. HoekCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-11-08· cited 41×
- Flynn v. HighamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-12-09· cited 35×
- Clark v. Allstate InsuranceS.D. California· 2000-07-27· cited 33×
- Monge v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-01-09· cited 24×
- Seidner v. 1551 Greenfield Owners Assn.California Court of Appeal· 1980-08-04· cited 23×
- Gervase v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-01-26· cited 16×
- Biddle v. ChatelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-09-16· cited 14×
- Gomez v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1985-06-28· cited 11×
- County of El Dorado v. SpenceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-06-20· cited 9×
- Osuna v. AlbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-06-25· cited 8×
- Cisneros v. Instant Capital Funding Group, Inc.E.D. California· 2009-09-18· cited 7×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,035×
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 1,026×
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 448×
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 349×
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1975-08-21· cited 329×
- Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-03-14· cited 260×
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court· 1974-08-21· cited 260×
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1970-01-20· cited 233×
- Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 178×
- Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court· 1963-03-12· cited 152×
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-09-06· cited 129×
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-04-02· cited 125×
- Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-09-11· cited 125×
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-06-10· cited 113×
- Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-05-06· cited 102×
- Raymond v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-07-03· cited 99×
- Brown v. ColmCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-06-07· cited 82×
- Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-11-17· cited 69×
- Keene v. WigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-04-25· cited 66×
- Richardson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1972-04-28· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.