Brosie v. Stockton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal and holding that court properly treated motion as a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, and not motion for summary judgment, because “the material extraneous to the pleadings” was “unnecessary to the final outcome”
• no conversion necessary when extraneous material was “unnecessary to the final outcome”
• no conversion necessary when extraneous material was “unnecessary to the final outcome”
• no conversion when extraneous material not necessary to final outcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).