Brooks v. Zahn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting appellate courts “defer to the trial court’s resolution of conflicting evidence with respect to alleged juror misconduct”
• \'We expect jurors to draw upon their common sense and experience and use their knowledge to assist in reaching a verdict.\
• registered nurse’s comments during jury deliberation regarding antibiotics, surgery and postoperative healing in medical malpractice action held product of her own experience and knowledge and not extraneous
• attorney should have questioned juror with specialized knowledge in nursing during voir dire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).