Skip to main content
· 3/21/1984

Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc.

Citations

  • 684 P.2d 888
  • 141 Ariz. 7
  • 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting contention that telling the jury to \send a message\ was an improper request for punitive damages
  • noting “sheer speculation” regarding the effect of purported jury misconduct cannot serve as grounds for a mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsall, Hathaway, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.