Brooks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Because “the statements were admissible for the purpose of explaining the circumstances surrounding the crime, no limiting instructions were required in the absence of a request.”
• Because “the statements were admissible for the purpose of explaining the circumstances surrounding the crime, no limiting instructions were required in the absence of a request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Racquemore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-04-29· cited 20×
• Boyd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-01-16· cited 14×
• Horne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-07-20· cited 3×
• Hoke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-10· cited 3×
• Bonker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-09· cited 1×
• Ruiz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-09-13· cited 1×
• Stephen R. Hoke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harrell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-04-05· cited 71×
• Fuqua v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-06-09· cited 31×
• McKenzie v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-09-23· cited 24×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-04-07· cited 18×
• Guthrie v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-10-02· cited 11×
• Japhet v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-09-05· cited 8×