Racquemore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sufficient evidence supported shoplifting conviction when defendant placed two packages of meat in his pants and returned them to shelf after store personnel started following him
• holding that the evidence was sufficient because the “defendant was seen stuffing two packages of meat into the waist of his trousers and pulling his shirt down over them”
• defendant’s statement made after he abandoned shoplifting attempt and entered store office for interview not part of res gestae
• intent proven by evidence defendant put two packages of meat in his pants, even though he returned them to display case
• testimony that defendant stated he was on probation not relevant to explain motive for crime
• intent proven by evidence defendant put two packages of meat in his pants, even though he returned them to display case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).