Brooks v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Inherited property does not lose its separate nature because a portion of the inheritance is used in furtherance of the marriage
• in domestic relations actions, this court has jurisdiction to find facts according to its own view of the preponderance of the evidence
• in domestic relations actions, this court has jurisdiction to find facts according to its own view of the preponderance of the evidence
• portion of inherited property used in support of marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
• Brandi v. Brandi
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-09-17· cited 31×
• Myers v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-01-20· cited 21×
• Peterkin v. Peterkin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-24· cited 19×
• McDuffie v. McDuffie Ex Rel. McDuffie
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-05-11· cited 11×
• Wannamaker v. Wannamaker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 10×
• Beyer v. Metze
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-02-18· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hussey v. Hussey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-01-23· cited 44×
• Shaluly v. Shaluly
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-08· cited 33×
• Bass v. Bass
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-27· cited 11×
• Beinor v. Beinor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-07-17· cited 8×
• Walker v. Frericks
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-13· cited 7×