Brooks v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• error in denying increase in child support where husband's income increased, purchasing power of the dollar declined, and minor children matured in six-year-period following divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zediker v. Zediker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-18· cited 68×
• Waldman v. Waldman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 39×
• Wanstall v. Wanstall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-02· cited 15×
• Mandy v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-06· cited 13×
• Bess v. Bess
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-25· cited 8×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-02· cited 7×
• Creel v. Creel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-11· cited 5×
• Boylan v. Cooper
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-06· cited 4×
• Wiedman v. Wiedman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-18· cited 3×
• Ispass v. Ispass
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-29· cited 1×
• Kirchen v. Kirchen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-12· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Shaw v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-05-12· cited 487×
• Schottenstein v. Schottenstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-17· cited 33×
• Scott v. Scott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-11-02· cited 29×
• Jelke v. Jelke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-02-17· cited 15×
• Pusey v. Pusey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-30· cited 13×