Skip to main content

Brooks v. Brooks

Citations

  • 652 So. 2d 1113
  • 1995 WL 135593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming chancery court's failure to find the ground of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment where husband's complaint boiled down to the fact that wife was not congenial
  • ability to pay attorneys' fees may be evaluated after the chancellor awards alimony and property to the parties upon remand
  • chancellor did not make his own findings, rather adopted litigant’s findings and applied wrong legal standard
  • husband could argue no more than that wife was not congenial toward him
  • \The best that Robert can argue is that Jane was not congenial towards him.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Sullivan and Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.