Arizona Supreme Court· 11/14/1995
Broadbent v. Broadbent
Citations
- 907 P.2d 43
- 184 Ariz. 74
- 203 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19
- 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding status as parent does not bar suit, but adopting reasonable parent test for suits of minors against parents
- remanding for trial where child fell into swimming pool and nearly drowned while mother left to answer telephone
- acknowledging the need “to protect the right of parents to raise their children by their own methods and in accordance with their own attitudes and beliefs”
- remanding for trial where propane gas stove exploded during family camping trip, injuring child
- “[W]e approve of the ‘reasonable parent test,’ in 20 which a parent’s conduct is judged by whether that parent’s conduct comported with that 21 of a reasonable and prudent parent in a similar situation.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corcoran, Feldman, Moeller, Zlaket, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. West American Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 30×
- Johnson v. PankratzCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-05-04· cited 27×
- Padilla v. RodasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-02-29· cited 24×
- Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court· 2008-07-24· cited 21×
- Fields v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-09-19· cited 19×
- Herzfeld v. HerzfeldSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-15· cited 8×
- Sepaugh v. LaGroneTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-12-11· cited 5×
- Bang v. TranMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1997-08-18· cited 3×
- Nolasco v. MalcomNebraska Supreme Court· 2020-09-25· cited 2×
- Herzfeld v. HerzfeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-10· cited 1×
- Newman v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-07-18· cited 1×
- Marietta Sepaugh, Individually, and as Next Friend of Her Minor Son, Frank LaGrone v. Paul LaGroneTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-12-11
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court· 1891-04-15· cited 292×
- Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 262×
- Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals· 1974-12-20· cited 213×
- Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 204×
- Roller v. RollerWashington Supreme Court· 1905-02-27· cited 128×
- McKelvey v. McKelveyTennessee Supreme Court· 1903-09-15· cited 122×
- Streenz v. StreenzArizona Supreme Court· 1970-06-11· cited 105×
- Glaskox by and Through Denton v. GlaskoxMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-10-29· cited 80×
- Rourk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-11-12· cited 25×
- Sandoval v. SandovalArizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-08· cited 21×
- Purcell v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-12-29· cited 17×
- Schleier for Alter v. AlterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-01-10· cited 16×
- Windauer v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-02-16· cited 9×
- Holodook v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1973-12-13· cited 9×
- SANDBAK BY AND THROUGH TULLY v. SandbakCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-06-07· cited 6×
- BROADBENT BY BROADBENT v. BroadbentCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.