Britton v. Britton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in awarding alimony, trial court properly considered husband's gross income and other factors listed in Mass. Gen. Laws c. 208, § 34 [2003]
• in awarding alimony, trial court properly considered husband’s gross income and other factors listed in Mass. Gen. Laws c. 208, § 34 [2003]
• party is bound by stipulation or agreement communicated to and acted on by court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maturo v. Maturo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
• eri/integral Holdings LLC v. Integral Fund I Investor, LLC; Iif1 Gp, LLC; Integral Development LLC; Eljp Real Estate, LLC; Egbert L.J. Perry; and Integral Investment Fund LLP
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2024-06-26

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lauricella v. Lauricella
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-22· cited 353×
• Knox v. Remick
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-12-08· cited 102×
• Grubert v. Grubert
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-09-24· cited 80×
• Drapek v. Drapek
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-02-17· cited 72×
• Gottsegen v. Gottsegen
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-05-22· cited 58×
• Dominick v. Dominick
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-05-03· cited 52×
• Stansel v. Stansel
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-03-05· cited 47×
• Larson v. Larson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-03-07· cited 44×
• DeCristofaro v. DeCristofaro
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-05-27· cited 37×
• Moore v. Moore
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-04-29· cited 32×
• Ruml v. Ruml
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-11-21· cited 20×
• Rosenberg v. Rosenberg
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-07-21· cited 11×
• Kehoe v. Kehoe
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-01-02· cited 8×