Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.
Citations
- 10 A.D.3d 520
- 782 N.Y.S.2d 58
- 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where some shareholders \received a lesser benefit than other shareholders” the harm was \suffered individually”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-03-10· cited 15×
- Semi-Tech Litigation, L.L.C. v. TingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-12-16· cited 4×
- Hribar v. Marsh & McLennan CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-05-11· cited 1×
- Hemingway Group LLC v. i80 Group LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-12-05
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2004-04-02· cited 479×
- Crescent/Mach I Partners, L.P. v. TurnerCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2000-09-29· cited 144×
- Strassburger v. EarleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2000-01-27· cited 56×
- Ault v. SoutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-05-10· cited 8×
- Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-12-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.