Skip to main content

Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.

Citations

  • 263 A.D.2d 352
  • 692 N.Y.S.2d 381
  • 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering two-page report that failed to document committee’s procedures, reasoning, and conclusions in determining that plaintiff raised reasonable doubt as to reasonableness of investigation
  • choosing as the place of accrual the state where the out-of-state company had its principal place of business and where the monetary damages would be felt
  • “[P]ursuant to New York’s borrowing statute, CPLR 202, the applicable Statute of Limitations is that of Georgia, since that is where [plaintiff] had its principal office” even though the [plaintiff] was incorporated in Delaware.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.