Skip to main content

Bright v. State

Citations

  • 875 P.2d 100
  • 1994 Alas. App. LEXIS 25
  • 1994 WL 249498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “any decision to hold a trial in a prison must be subjected to the strictest scrutiny, and that decision must be supported by compelling reasons”
  • declining to adopt a bright-line rule that convening a criminal trial in a prison is per se prohibited under the Sixth Amendment
  • declining to adopt a bright-line rule that convening a criminal trial in a prison is per se prohibited under the Sixth Amendment
  • “[W]e are unwilling to flatly declare that the Alaska Constitution prohibits holding a criminal trial in a prison under any and all circumstances.”
  • absent showing of compelling reasons, criminal trial held in prison violated federal and state right to public trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Wolverton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.