Court of Appeals of Alaska· 8/5/2011
Bridge v. State
Citations
- 258 P.3d 923
- 2011 Alas. App. LEXIS 79
- 2011 WL 3429646
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the definition of \confinement\ for purposes of the second-degree escape statute does not necessarily govern the meaning of this term for other purposes \because it is possible for the same word or phrase to have different meanings in different contexts\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- State v. KalaolaHawaii Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 99×
- Rust v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-09-15· cited 56×
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-09-14· cited 44×
- State v. RosaireNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 38×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-05-13· cited 30×
- State v. OtnessCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-08-13· cited 14×
- Beckman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-10-12· cited 12×
- State v. StraneAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-01-10· cited 12×
- State v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-03-24· cited 6×
- West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-01-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.