Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 12/16/1999
Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. v. Johnson
Citations
- 7 S.W.3d 862
- 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 9385
- 1999 WL 1208512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding there is a fact issue whether a defendant breached his fiduciary duty and “whether any breach was a proximate cause of damages[.]”
- noting “general” assertions of existence of “genuine issues of material fact” inadequate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sam Nuchia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court· 2002-03-21· cited 1,200×
- Environmental Procedures, Inc. v. GuidryTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-03· cited 108×
- Roventini v. Ocular Sciences, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-06-26· cited 101×
- Brown v. Swett & Crawford of Texas, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-09-15· cited 97×
- Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. v. JohnsonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-21· cited 66×
- Caldwell v. CurioniTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-02-10· cited 62×
- Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-04-05· cited 59×
- Flanary v. MillsTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-10-28· cited 54×
- Kastner v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-08-20· cited 53×
- Coffman v. Provost ★ Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P.E.D. Texas· 2001-04-05· cited 30×
- Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp. v. CarpenterTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-09-24· cited 29×
- Mayes v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-09-24· cited 23×
- Collins v. SmithTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-08-09· cited 20×
- Lucio v. John G. & Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial FoundationTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-09-17· cited 19×
- Simon Ramirez v. Colonial Freight Warehouse Co. Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-04-22· cited 18×
- Juan Hsien Yang Sher v. Fun Travel World, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-23· cited 8×
- Longtin v. Country One Stop, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-11-26· cited 2×
- Power Reps, Inc., Bob Bergin and Jeff Jacquin v. Cy Cates, Power Reps Industrial, LLC, and Global Transformer Specialists, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-08-13
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-08-25
- Donald & Tammy Roventini, Ind. & ANF Michael Roventini v. Ocular Sciences, Inc. & See-N-Focus Optical, IncTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-06-26
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 1995-01-12· cited 1,496×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court· 1993-09-10· cited 1,051×
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 997×
- Jackson v. Fiesta Mart, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-10-29· cited 477×
- Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. WinogradTexas Supreme Court· 1997-12-12· cited 245×
- Kline v. O'QUINNCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-12· cited 174×
- MacIas v. Fiesta Mart, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-02-18· cited 143×
- Stephanz v. LairdTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-01-14· cited 125×
- Lawson v. B Four Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-12-15· cited 107×
- Nawas v. R & S VENDINGTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-04-16· cited 54×
- Home Indemnity Co. v. PateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-08-22· cited 42×
- Bray v. SquiresTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-11-27· cited 29×
- MPI, INC. v. DupreCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.