Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Winograd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations on claim for damage to real property ran as soon as property owner knew of presence of a hazardous chemical on the property, not when the residue exceeded regulatory contamination levels
• holding that the statute of limitations on a claim for damage to real property ran as soon as property owner knew of the presence of a hazardous chemical on the property, not when the residue exceeded regulatory contamination levels
• holding that the statute of limitations on a claim for damage to real property ran as soon as property owner knew of the presence of a hazardous chemical on the property, not 5 when the residue exceeded regulatory contamination levels
• holding respondent could not rely on tolling doctrine of fraudulent concealment because respondent was aware of hazardous nature of chemical at time it accused petitioner of concealing dangers of chemical at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).