· 4/18/2011
Brenner v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Citations
- 806 F. Supp. 2d 786
- 2011 WL 1464552
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41663
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding claims ―regarding the nature and size of ballast used for track stability, support, and drainage‖ are precluded by FRSA but recognizing nonpreclusion of claims regarding ballast in areas not being used for stability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joyner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.