Emmel Tolston v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] plaintiff need not be sure which cause is predominant, as long as she knows or has reason to know of a potential cause”
• involving knee pain and stating that medical opinion that injury was work-related was not necessary for claim to accrue
• “Just to be clear the [Fries] court added [that] this rule imposes on plaintiffs the affirmative duty to investigate the cause of a known injury”
• “At some point, persons with degenerative conditions have a duty to investigate cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).