Skip to main content

Breezevale Ltd. v. Dickinson

Citations

  • 759 A.2d 627
  • 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 224
  • 2000 WL 1358498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that client’s forging of documents did not play a substantial part in damaging the lawsuit
  • considering the potential contributory negligence of a client in a legal malpractice case
  • “This jury knew of Breezevale’s fraud and concluded that Breezevale nonetheless would have prevailed at trial. We do not think this conclusion was without any support.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steadman, Schwelb, Ruiz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.