Brassfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jurors' limited use of transcript during playing of tape recording not error
• trial court did not error in allowing jury to use transcript of audiotaped conversation where transcript was not admitted into evidence and was to be used only as an aid in following the audiotape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-01-17· cited 79×
• Alverson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-05-06· cited 71×
• Jack Lauren Martin v. Stephen W. Kaiser Attorney General, State of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 1990-06-21· cited 58×
• Guy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-07-19· cited 17×
• State v. Kraus
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-07-13· cited 12×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-10-19· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian Brown
  Tenth Circuit· 1979-05-01· cited 165×
• Dyke v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-04-01· cited 25×
• Bonicelli v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1959-05-20· cited 22×
• United States v. Richard Gordon
  Eighth Circuit· 1982-09-09· cited 20×
• Helfrich v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-02-16· cited 6×