Skip to main content

Branch v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 300 S.E.2d 758
  • 225 Va. 91
  • 1983 Va. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting the minority position that this situation does not support a conviction for robbery, but rather separate convictions for assault and theft
  • stating, “[t]he intent to steal and the taking must coexist” and “the offense is not robbery unless the animus furandi was conceived before or at the time the violence was committed”
  • no evidence of intent to rob where idea to take and destroy victim’s identification from his wallet occurred only after alleged accidental murder; holding evidence insufficient as a matter of law to support robbery conviction
  • no evidence of intent to rob where idea to take and destroy victim's identification from his wallet occurred only after alleged accidental murder; holding evidence insufficient as a matter of law to support robbery conviction
  • refusing to consider hearsay objection first presented on appeal
  • refusing to consider hearsay objection first presented on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Cochran, Poff, Compton, Thompson, Stephenson, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.