Patterson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that Vorpahl “held that there is no right to a jury trial of ERISA claims” and stating the Mertens decision confirms it
• assuming, without any discernible analysis or citation, the availability of disparate impact theory, presumably in light of Leftwich, 702 F.2d 686

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).