Braham v. Honolulu Amusement Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [complaint] ... contained] no allegation ... of any breach of any duty fixed by law independently of the will of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blair v. Ing
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-09-10· cited 95×
• Smothers v. Renander
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-09-11· cited 45×
• Rosa v. Johnston
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-10-04· cited 35×
• Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc., Defendant/third-Party and Bechtel, Inc., Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1982-03-31· cited 15×
• Kamalu v. Paren, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 8×
• Barkhorn v. Adlib Associates, Inc.
  D. Hawaii· 1964-01-07· cited 7×
• Chapman v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.
  D. Hawaii· 1966-06-23· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Whittenton Manuf'g Co. v. Memphis & Ohio River Packet Co.
  U.S. Circuit Court· 1884-10-22· cited 12×