E.D. New York· 3/27/2000
Brady v. KBI Security Service, Inc.
Citations
- 91 F. Supp. 2d 504
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4561
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- hostile work environment claim failed where alleged hostility was based on non-racial grounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nickerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Yvette Cruz v. Coach Stores, Inc., David Otani, William Betts, Diane Lewis, Sara Lee Corporation, and Herve HeriveauxSecond Circuit· 2000-01-20· cited 804×
- Schwapp v. Town of AvonSecond Circuit· 1997-07-02· cited 664×
- Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1996-09-11· cited 519×
- William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1997-03-25· cited 362×
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverTenth Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 333×
- Snell v. Suffolk CountySecond Circuit· 1986-01-22· cited 88×
- Ticali v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BrooklynE.D. New York· 1999-03-24· cited 46×
- Kaible v. U.S. Computer Group, Inc.E.D. New York· 1998-10-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.