William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allegations of bias against a supervisor who was not consulted about a termination decision “provide no basis for imputing to [the decision maker] an invidious motivation for the discharge”
• affirming summary judgment where the record “establishes indisputably that, for race-neutral reasons, [plaintiffs] performance was not satisfactory”
• requiring that I “draw all permissible factual inferences” in plaintiff’s favor
• defining a wrongful-termination claim based on the circumstances of a plaintiff's discharge by the employer
• rationalizing “deficiencies” does not “demonstrat[e] [] any genuine issue of material fact to be tried”
• affirming district court’s finding that plaintiff did not satisfy the second element to establish a prima facie case of discrimination where plaintiff’s employment performance was unsatisfactory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).