Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/25/1980
Brady v. Brady
Citations
- 403 N.E.2d 1174
- 380 Mass. 480
- 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statutory expression of one thing is implied exclusion of other things omitted from statute not followed where it would frustrate general beneficial purpose of statute
- in construing statutes, maxim “that the express inclusion of one thing implies the exclusion of another” will not be followed when doing so “would frustrate the general beneficial purposes of the legislation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Kaplan, Liacos, Abrams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-11· cited 74×
- Lynn Teachers Union, Local 1037 v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-01-22· cited 56×
- Simon v. State Examiners of ElectriciansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-06-25· cited 44×
- Bank of America, N.A. v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-12-18· cited 40×
- Collatos v. Boston Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-02-05· cited 39×
- Fafard v. Lincoln Pharmacy of Milford, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-06-04· cited 25×
- In re SegalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-11-16· cited 24×
- Bagley v. Illyrian Gardens, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-03-09· cited 20×
- Ciampi v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-08-15· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. LoboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-03-02· cited 16×
- County of Middlesex v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-05-17· cited 16×
- Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-12-13· cited 16×
- Talbot v. TalbotMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-04-22· cited 14×
- Downing v. DowningMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-11-30· cited 14×
- Trust Insurance v. Bruce at Park Chiropractic ClinicMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-01-20· cited 13×
- Department of Revenue v. C.M.J.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-06-30· cited 13×
- Petrucci v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-11-30· cited 10×
- Mullins v. GarthwaitD. Massachusetts· 1994-11-17· cited 5×
- Town Council v. Town ManagerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-05-23· cited 5×
- Durham v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-02-10· cited 4×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knox v. RemickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-12-08· cited 102×
- Bianco v. BiancoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-12-06· cited 70×
- Wood v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-02-03· cited 23×
- Hillery v. HilleryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-04-04· cited 20×
- Ainslie v. AinslieMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1978-11-21· cited 18×
- Utley v. UtleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-03-10· cited 16×
- Blitzer v. BlitzerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-05-10· cited 13×
- Moran v. MoranMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-03-03· cited 7×
- Carroll v. Acting Director of Public Welfare of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-01-08· cited 6×
- Leach v. LeachMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1976-06-02· cited 3×
- Brady v. BradyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-07-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.