Skip to main content

Bradley v. State

Citations

  • 262 Or. App. 78
  • 324 P.3d 504
  • 2014 WL 1316274
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the payment of reasonable attorney fees and costs by the peti- tioner, regardless of the outcome, is not a ‘purchase’ within the meaning of that constitutional provision”
  • concluding that “the payment of reasonable attorney fees and costs by the peti- tioner, regardless of the outcome, is not a ‘purchase’ within the meaning of that constitutional provision”
  • upholding large attorney fee award because “[u]nlike exorbitant filing fees, the amount of an attorney-fee award varies depending on the nature of the parties’ disputes and is not determined until the end of the proceeding”
  • upholding large attorney fee award because “[u]nlike exorbitant filing fees, the amount of an attorney-fee award varies depending on the nature of the parties’ disputes and is not determined until the end of the proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.