Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/2/2014
Bradley v. State
Citations
- 262 Or. App. 78
- 324 P.3d 504
- 2014 WL 1316274
- 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the payment of reasonable attorney fees and costs by the peti- tioner, regardless of the outcome, is not a ‘purchase’ within the meaning of that constitutional provision”
- concluding that “the payment of reasonable attorney fees and costs by the peti- tioner, regardless of the outcome, is not a ‘purchase’ within the meaning of that constitutional provision”
- upholding large attorney fee award because “[u]nlike exorbitant filing fees, the amount of an attorney-fee award varies depending on the nature of the parties’ disputes and is not determined until the end of the proceeding”
- upholding large attorney fee award because “[u]nlike exorbitant filing fees, the amount of an attorney-fee award varies depending on the nature of the parties’ disputes and is not determined until the end of the proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court· 1951-02-26· cited 526×
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 177×
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court· 1958-09-17· cited 73×
- Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 59×
- Tharp v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 58×
- Ramsey v. KantorNinth Circuit· 1996-09-19· cited 43×
- Ernst Home Center, Inc. v. SatoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-05· cited 26×
- Worcester-Tatnuck Square CVS, Inc. v. KaplanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-11-02· cited 22×
- State Treasurer v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-12-13· cited 17×
- Brookshire v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-15· cited 15×
- Marinclin v. UrlingW.D. Pennsylvania· 1967-01-10· cited 15×
- Town of Selah v. WaldbauerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-31· cited 9×
- Hewitt v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1969-07-16· cited 8×
- Bailey v. FrushOregon Supreme Court· 1873-12-15· cited 7×
- Witten v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-19· cited 6×
- Braat v. AylettOregon Supreme Court· 1975-12-18· cited 6×
- Allen v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.