Massachusetts Appeals Court· 11/2/1992
Worcester-Tatnuck Square CVS, Inc. v. Kaplan
Citations
- 601 N.E.2d 485
- 33 Mass. App. Ct. 499
- 1992 Mass. App. LEXIS 868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a lease term that prevents a landlord from unreasonably withholding consent to a sublease prescribes that the landlord “shall act in accordance with usual standards of reasonableness,” which is a question for the factfinder (internal quotation marks omitted)
- landlord reasonably withheld consent to sublease where a percentage rent agreement was in place, even though the agreement could only be initiated if the tenant's sales exceeded a designated volume level, and such level had never been achieved
- “The lease provided that CVS had the right to sublet all or part of the premises so long as Kaplan consented in writing. Kaplan, however, could not unreasonably withhold his consent. Compare 21 Merchants Row Corp. v. Merchants Row, Inc., 412 Mass. 204 (1992)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fine, Gillerman, Greenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-02-06· cited 61×
- Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. Lafferty, Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. LaffertyFirst Circuit· 1993-03-30· cited 32×
- WHTR Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Distributing, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-04-12· cited 29×
- Halper v. DemeterMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-04-01· cited 27×
- Lagrew v. Hooks-SupeRx, Inc.E.D. Kentucky· 1995-03-10· cited 13×
- Pequot Spring Water Co. v. BrunelleConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-08-12· cited 9×
- Chapman v. KatzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-03-16· cited 6×
- Sherman v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2012-07-26· cited 5×
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 4×
- Wright v. Rub-A-Dub Car Wash, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-08-12· cited 3×
- Nisby v. SheskeyMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2007-06-26· cited 3×
- Darin, LLC v. StratEdge Corp.Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2008-04-04· cited 2×
- Rey v. LaffertyFirst Circuit· 1993-03-30
- Harold W. Wright v. Rub-A-Dub Car Wash, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-01-08
- National Union Fire Insurance v. RoseMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-01-14
- 1274 Massachusetts Avenue Corp. v. 1280 Massachusetts Avenue Ltd. PartnershipMassachusetts Superior Court· 1998-12-22
- Polar Corp. v. USS Industrial Park Associates, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court· 1998-12-23
- Tretola v. GosselsMassachusetts Superior Court· 2001-04-30
- WHTR Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Distributing, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2002-08-29
- KRR Pembroke, LLC v. Global Data Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2006-06-19
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-12-20· cited 148×
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1985-12-05· cited 104×
- Stop & Shop, Inc. v. GanemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-06-26· cited 87×
- Kohl v. Silver Lake Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-03-02· cited 86×
- Piccicuto v. DwyerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-02-13· cited 25×
- Haack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-06-03· cited 21×
- Nassif v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1960-03-15· cited 21×
- Adams, Harkness & Hill, Inc. v. Northeast Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-04-07· cited 15×
- Martha's Vineyard Auto Village, Inc. v. NewmanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-03-27· cited 13×
- 21 Merchants Row Corp. v. Merchants Row, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-03-11· cited 10×
- College Block v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal· 1988-12-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.