Boyer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that introduction into evidence of the actual written document containing the defendant’s confession constituted additional, corroborative evidence of the testimony previously presented concerning the confession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Knight v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-07· cited 34×
• Facon v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 21×
• Pappaconstantinou v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-11· cited 10×
• Hunter v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-05-29· cited 9×
• Griner v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-25· cited 9×
• Harrison v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-30· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hunt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-28· cited 176×
• Riddick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
• Hillard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-05· cited 136×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-09· cited 107×
• People v. Olsen
  New York Court of Appeals· 1974-06-13· cited 104×
• Robert Lewis Eason and Kenneth Lamoyne Nowlin v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1960-09-07· cited 85×
• Hoey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-05· cited 83×
• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-08-24· cited 67×
• Streams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-05· cited 57×
• Dyson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-04· cited 23×
• Ringe v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-12· cited 5×
• Garbutt v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-12· cited 2×